Your Ad Here

The price of green living? Biofuels causing world food crisis

Paprika's picture

Biofuel production is a hot topic these days. A hot topic and a hot potato. While it can be argued that biofuel has its advantages, not least of which is having it stand in for fossil fuels, it does have its drawbacks.

For one thing, when you use land and resources to raise plants to make fuel instead of food, a tug-of-war is basically bound to happen. There is, after all, a limited space on the Earth to grow plants on.

The US government under the Bush administration has claimed that plant-derived fuels contribute no more than 3% to inflation in food prices. A leaked confidential report from the World Bank, however, says something else.

According to the report, biofuels raise food prices up by as much as 75%, grossly higher than what was estimated by the US government. It is believed that the report was suppressed as to spare the Bush administration the political pressure, and the embarrassment.

The report basically states that as grains and vegetables are being used more for fuel rather than, well, food, the end result is that the price of food (for eating) goes higher. Many countries might not feel the full effects of the inflation, but poorer countries will.

Not that I'm against biofuels. I just want to pose the question: can the world afford it? And I'm not just talking money.
__________________________



neckromancer's picture
Submitted by neckromancer on Sun, 07/06/2008 - 08:24.

Aside from space for residences, for commerce and industry, another factor that will compute for land use is space for growing biofuel. In the Philippines, it is jatropa (niyog-niyogan) that is being touted as the "SOURCE". But even though it is relatively common in the countryside, when we talk of commercial production, large areas of land need to be set aside for the growing of this "crop". Currently how much is being be added to conventional gas? Just 1%! 98+% is still fossil fuel. And still biofuels are not as "green" as solar, wind or hydro energy. They still need to be burnt to be useful, and will still have carbon dioxide (among other greenhouse gases) as a byproduct.

Just my thoughts.

__________________________

Inggit sa long hair ko.

kinjikitatani's picture
Submitted by kinjikitatani on Mon, 07/07/2008 - 05:08.

yes, sugar will be very expensive as sugarcane will now be used as biofuel. eh di mag equal artificial sweetener na lang tayo, which, by the way causes cancer raw. it's either diabetes or cancer. or expensive fuel vs. expensive sugar. there must be another way.

__________________________

I don't judge other people.  I just laugh at their mistakes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text, URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Your Ad Here